Graphic of the City of Oakland tree ADA Programs Contact the City  |  Oaklandnet""
  Home-> Resources-> City of Oakland Web Accessibility Guidelines

Information about web accessibility guidelines can be found below. The guidelines are excerpted from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Web Accessibility Initiative. Full text of the guidelines, including the glossary and specific accessibility techniques, can be found at http://www.w3c.org/WAI.

Skip to the text of the guidelines

Guideline # 1: Provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content.

Guideline # 2: Don't rely on color alone.

Guideline # 3: Use markup and style sheets and do so properly.

Guideline # 4: Clarify natural language usage.

Guideline # 5: Create tables that transform gracefully.

Guideline # 6: Ensure that pages featuring new technologies transform gracefully.

Guideline # 7: Ensure user control of time-sensitive content changes.

Guideline # 8: Ensure direct accessibility of embedded user interfaces.

Guideline # 9: Design for device-independence.

Guideline # 10: Use interim solutions.

Guideline # 11: Use W3C technologies and guidelines.

Guideline # 12: Provide context and orientation information.

Guideline # 13: Provide clear navigation mechanisms.

Guideline # 14: Ensure that documents are clear and simple.

Appendix A. -- Validation

top of page

Guideline 1. Provide equivalent alternatives to auditory and visual content.

Provide content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially the same function or purpose as auditory or visual content.

Although some people cannot use images, movies, sounds, applets, etc. directly, they may still use pages that include equivalent information to the visual or auditory content. The equivalent information must serve the same purpose as the visual or auditory content. Thus, a text equivalent for an image of an upward arrow that links to a table of contents could be "Go to table of contents". In some cases, an equivalent should also describe the appearance of visual content (e.g., for complex charts, billboards, or diagrams) or the sound of auditory content (e.g., for audio samples used in education).

Checkpoints:
1.1 Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g., via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content). This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets and programmatic objects, ascii art, frames, scripts, images used as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks of video, and video.

For example, in HTML:
Use "alt" for the IMG, INPUT, and APPLET elements, or provide a text equivalent in the content of the OBJECT and APPLET elements.
For complex content (e.g., a chart) where the "alt" text does not provide a complete text equivalent, provide an additional description using, for example, "longdesc" with IMG or FRAME, a link inside an OBJECT element, or a description link.

For image maps, either use the "alt" attribute with AREA, or use the MAP element with A elements (and other text) as content.

1.2 Provide redundant text links for each active region of a server-side image map.

1.3 Until user agents can automatically read aloud the text equivalent of a visual track, provide an auditory description of the important information of the visual track of a multimedia presentation.

1.4 For any time-based multimedia presentation (e.g., a movie or animation), synchronize equivalent alternatives (e.g., captions or auditory descriptions of the visual track) with the presentation.

1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side image map links, provide redundant text links for each active region of a client-side image map.

top of page

Guideline 2. Don't rely on color alone.

Ensure that text and graphics are understandable when viewed without color.
If color alone is used to convey information, people who cannot differentiate between certain colors and users with devices that have non-color or non-visual displays will not receive the information. When foreground and background colors are too close to the same hue, they may not provide sufficient contrast when viewed using monochrome displays or by people with different types of color deficits.

Checkpoints:
2.1 Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available without color, for example from context or markup.

2.2 Ensure that foreground and background color combinations provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.

top of page

Guideline 3. Use markup and style sheets and do so properly.

Mark up documents with the proper structural elements. Control presentation with style sheets rather than with presentation elements and attributes.
Using markup improperly -- not according to specification -- hinders accessibility. Misusing markup for a presentation effect (e.g., using a table for layout or a header to change the font size) makes it difficult for users with specialized software to understand the organization of the page or to navigate through it. Furthermore, using presentation markup rather than structural markup to convey structure (e.g., constructing what looks like a table of data with an HTML PRE element) makes it difficult to render a page intelligibly to other devices.
Content developers may be tempted to use (or misuse) constructs that achieve a desired formatting effect on older browsers. They must be aware that these practices cause accessibility problems and must consider whether the formatting effect is so critical as to warrant making the document inaccessible to some users.
At the other extreme, content developers must not sacrifice appropriate markup because a certain browser or assistive technology does not process it correctly. For example, it is appropriate to use the TABLE element in HTML to mark up tabular information even though some older screen readers may not handle side-by-side text correctly (refer to checkpoint 10.3). Using TABLE correctly and creating tables that transform gracefully (refer to guideline 5) makes it possible for software to render tables other than as two-dimensional grids.

Checkpoints:
3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather than images to convey information.
For example, use MathML to mark up mathematical equations, and style sheets to format text and control layout. Also, avoid using images to represent text -- use text and style sheets instead. Refer also to guideline 6 and guideline 11.

3.2 Create documents that validate to published formal grammars.
For example, include a document type declaration at the beginning of a document that refers to a published DTD (e.g., the strict HTML 4.0 DTD).

3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
For example, use the CSS 'font' property instead of the HTML FONT element to control font styles.

3.4 Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language attribute values and style sheet property values.
For example, in CSS, use 'em' or percentage lengths rather than 'pt' or 'cm', which are absolute units. If absolute units are used, validate that the rendered content is usable (refer to the section on validation).

3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use them according to specification.
For example, in HTML, use H2 to indicate a subsection of H1. Do not use headers for font effects.

3.6 Mark up lists and list items properly.
For example, in HTML, nest OL, UL, and DL lists properly.

3.7 Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting effects such as indentation.
For example, in HTML, use the Q and BLOCKQUOTE elements to markup short and longer quotations, respectively.

top of page

Guideline 4. Clarify natural language usage


Use markup that facilitates pronunciation or interpretation of abbreviated or foreign text.
When content developers mark up natural language changes in a document, speech synthesizers and braille devices can automatically switch to the new language, making the document more accessible to multilingual users. Content developers should identify the predominant natural language of a document's content (through markup or HTTP headers). Content developers should also provide expansions of abbreviations and acronyms.
In addition to helping assistive technologies, natural language markup allows search engines to find key words and identify documents in a desired language. Natural language markup also improves readability of the Web for all people, including those with learning disabilities, cognitive disabilities, or people who are deaf.
When abbreviations and natural language changes are not identified, they may be indecipherable when machine-spoken or brailled.

Checkpoints:
4.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions).
For example, in HTML use the "lang" attribute. In XML, use "xml:lang".

4.2 Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in a document where it first occurs.
For example, in HTML, use the "title" attribute of the ABBR and ACRONYM elements. Providing the expansion in the main body of the document also helps document usability.

4.3 Identify the primary natural language of a document.
For example, in HTML set the "lang" attribute on the HTML element. In XML, use "xml:lang". Server operators should configure servers to take advantage of HTTP content negotiation mechanisms so that clients can automatically retrieve documents of the preferred language.

top of page

Guideline 5. Create tables that transform gracefully.

Ensure that tables have necessary markup to be transformed by accessible browsers and other user agents.
Tables should be used to mark up truly tabular information ("data tables"). Content developers should avoid using them to lay out pages ("layout tables"). Tables for any use also present special problems to users of screen readers (refer to checkpoint 10.3).
Some user agents allow users to navigate among table cells and access header and other table cell information. Unless marked-up properly, these tables will not provide user agents with the appropriate information. (Refer also to guideline 3.)
The following checkpoints will directly benefit people who access a table through auditory means (e.g., a screen reader or an automobile-based personal computer) or who view only a portion of the page at a time (e.g., users with blindness or low vision using speech output or a braille display, or other users of devices with small displays, etc.).

Checkpoints:
5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.
For example, in HTML, use TD to identify data cells and TH to identify headers.

5.2 For data tables that have two or more logical levels of row or column headers, use markup to associate data cells and header cells.
For example, in HTML, use THEAD, TFOOT, and TBODY to group rows, COL and COLGROUP to group columns, and the "axis", "scope", and "headers" attributes, to describe more complex relationships among data.

5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense, provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version).
Note: Once user agents support style sheet positioning, tables should not be used for layout. Refer also to checkpoint 3.3.

5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural markup for the purpose of visual formatting.
For example, in HTML do not use the TH element to cause the content of a (non-table header) cell to be displayed centered and in bold.

5.5 Provide summaries for tables.
For example, in HTML, use the "summary" attribute of the TABLE element.

5.6 Provide abbreviations for header labels.
For example, in HTML, use the "abbr" attribute on the TH element.
Refer also to checkpoint 10.3.

Guideline 6. Ensure that pages featuring new technologies transform gracefully.


Ensure that pages are accessible even when newer technologies are not supported or are turned off.
Although content developers are encouraged to use new technologies that solve problems raised by existing technologies, they should know how to make their pages still work with older browsers and people who choose to turn off features.

Checkpoints:
6.1 Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets. For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document.
When content is organized logically, it will be rendered in a meaningful order when style sheets are turned off or not supported.

6.2 Ensure that equivalents for dynamic content are updated when the dynamic content changes.

6.3 Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported. If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an alternative accessible page.
For example, ensure that links that trigger scripts work when scripts are turned off or not supported (e.g., do not use "javascript:" as the link target). If it is not possible to make the page usable without scripts, provide a text equivalent with the NOSCRIPT element, or use a server-side script instead of a client-side script, or provide an alternative accessible page as per checkpoint 11.4.

6.4 For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are input device-independent.

6.5 Ensure that dynamic content is accessible or provide an alternative presentation or page.
For example, in HTML, use NOFRAMES at the end of each frameset. For some applications, server-side scripts may be more accessible than client-side scripts.
Refer also to checkpoint 11.4.

 

Guideline 7. Ensure user control of time-sensitive content changes.

Ensure that moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating objects or pages may be paused or stopped.
Some people with cognitive or visual disabilities are unable to read moving text quickly enough or at all. Movement can also cause such a distraction that the rest of the page becomes unreadable for people with cognitive disabilities. Screen readers are unable to read moving text. People with physical disabilities might not be able to move quickly or accurately enough to interact with moving objects.
Note: All of the following checkpoints involve some content developer responsibility until user agents provide adequate feature control mechanisms.

Checkpoints:
7.1 Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid causing the screen to flicker.
Note: People with photosensitive epilepsy can have seizures triggered by flickering or flashing in the 4 to 59 flashes per second (Hertz) range with a peak sensitivity at 20 flashes per second as well as quick changes from dark to light (like strobe lights).

7.2 Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular rate, such as turning on and off).

7.3 Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid movement in pages.
When a page includes moving content, provide a mechanism within a script or applet to allow users to freeze motion or updates. Using style sheets with scripting to create movement allows users to turn off or override the effect more easily. Refer also to guideline 8.

7.4 Until user agents provide the ability to stop the refresh, do not create periodically auto-refreshing pages.
For example, in HTML, don't cause pages to auto-refresh with "HTTP-EQUIV=refresh" until user agents allow users to turn off the feature.

7.5 Until user agents provide the ability to stop auto-redirect, do not use markup to redirect pages automatically. Instead, configure the server to perform redirects.
Note: The BLINK and MARQUEE elements are not defined in any W3C HTML specification and should not be used. Refer also to guideline 11.

top of page

 

Guideline 8. Ensure direct accessibility of embedded user interfaces.

Ensure that the user interface follows principles of accessible design: device-independent access to functionality, keyboard operability, self-voicing, etc.
When an embedded object has its "own interface", the interface -- like the interface to the browser itself -- must be accessible. If the interface of the embedded object cannot be made accessible, an alternative accessible solution must be provided.
Note: For information about accessible interfaces, please consult the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-USERAGENT]) and the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-AUTOOL]).

Checkpoint:
8.1 Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly accessible or compatible with assistive technologies
Refer also to guideline 6.

top of page

 

Guideline 9. Design for device-independence.

Use features that enable activation of page elements via a variety of input devices.
Device-independent access means that the user may interact with the user agent or document with a preferred input (or output) device -- mouse, keyboard, voice, head wand, or other. If, for example, a form control can only be activated with a mouse or other pointing device, someone who is using the page without sight, with voice input, or with a keyboard or who is using some other non-pointing input device will not be able to use the form.
Note: Providing text equivalents for image maps or images used as links makes it possible for users to interact with them without a pointing device. Refer also to guideline 1.
Generally, pages that allow keyboard interaction are also accessible through speech input or a command line interface.

Checkpoints:
9.1 Provide client-side image maps instead of server-side image maps except where the regions cannot be defined with an available geometric shape.
Refer also to checkpoint 1.1, checkpoint 1.2, and checkpoint 1.5.

9.2 Ensure that any element that has its own interface can be operated in a device-independent manner.
Refer to the definition of device independence.
Refer also to guideline 8.

9.3 For scripts, specify logical event handlers rather than device-dependent event handlers.

9.4 Create a logical tab order through links, form controls, and objects.
For example, in HTML, specify tab order via the "tabindex" attribute or ensure a logical page design.

9.5 Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including those in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of form controls.
For example, in HTML, specify shortcuts via the "accesskey" attribute.

top of page

Guideline 10. Use interim solutions.

Use interim accessibility solutions so that assistive technologies and older browsers will operate correctly.
For example, older browsers do not allow users to navigate to empty edit boxes. Older screen readers read lists of consecutive links as one link. These active elements are therefore difficult or impossible to access. Also, changing the current window or popping up new windows can be very disorienting to users who cannot see that this has happened.
Note: The following checkpoints apply until user agents (including assistive technologies) address these issues. These checkpoints are classified as "interim", meaning that the Web Content Guidelines Working Group considers them to be valid and necessary to Web accessibility as of the publication of this document. However, the Working Group does not expect these checkpoints to be necessary in the future, once Web technologies have incorporated anticipated features or capabilities.

Checkpoints:
10.1 Until user agents allow users to turn off spawned windows, do not cause pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change the current window without informing the user.
For example, in HTML, avoid using a frame whose target is a new window.

10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned.
The label must immediately precede its control on the same line (allowing more than one control/label per line) or be in the line preceding the control (with only one label and one control per line). Refer also to checkpoint 12.4.

10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative (on the current page or some other) for all tables that lay out text in parallel, word-wrapped columns.
Note: Please consult the definition of linearized table. This checkpoint benefits people with user agents (such as some screen readers) that are unable to handle blocks of text presented side-by-side; the checkpoint should not discourage content developers from using tables to represent tabular information.

10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.
For example, in HTML, do this for TEXTAREA and INPUT.

10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links.

top of page

 

Guideline 11. Use W3C technologies and guidelines.

Use W3C technologies (according to specification) and follow accessibility guidelines. Where it is not possible to use a W3C technology, or doing so results in material that does not transform gracefully, provide an alternative version of the content that is accessible.
The current guidelines recommend W3C technologies (e.g., HTML, CSS, etc.) for several reasons:

  • W3C technologies include "built-in" accessibility features.
  • W3C specifications undergo early review to ensure that accessibility issues are considered during the design phase.
  • W3C specifications are developed in an open, industry consensus process.


Many non-W3C formats (e.g., PDF, Shockwave, etc.) require viewing with either plug-ins or stand-alone applications. Often, these formats cannot be viewed or navigated with standard user agents (including assistive technologies). Avoiding non-W3C and non-standard features (proprietary elements, attributes, properties, and extensions) will tend to make pages more accessible to more people using a wider variety of hardware and software. When inaccessible technologies (proprietary or not) must be used, equivalent accessible pages must be provided.
Even when W3C technologies are used, they must be used in accordance with accessibility guidelines. When using new technologies, ensure that they transform gracefully (Refer also to guideline 6.).
Note: Converting documents (from PDF, PostScript, RTF, etc.) to W3C markup languages (HTML, XML) does not always create an accessible document. Therefore, validate each page for accessibility and usability after the conversion process (refer to the section on validation). If a page does not readily convert, either revise the page until its original representation converts appropriately or provide an HTML or plain text version.

Checkpoints:
11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for a task and use the latest versions when supported. (Consult http://www.w3c.org/).
Refer to the list of references for information about where to find the latest W3C specifications and [WAI-UA-SUPPORT] for information about user agent support for W3C technologies.

11.2 Avoid deprecated features of W3C technologies.
For example, in HTML, don't use the deprecated FONT element; use style sheets instead (e.g., the 'font' property in CSS).

11.3 Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type, etc.)
Note: Use content negotiation where possible.

11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies, is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality), and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page.
Note: Content developers should only resort to alternative pages when other solutions fail because alternative pages are generally updated less often than "primary" pages. An out-of-date page may be as frustrating as one that is inaccessible since, in both cases, the information presented on the original page is unavailable. Automatically generating alternative pages may lead to more frequent updates, but content developers must still be careful to ensure that generated pages always make sense, and that users are able to navigate a site by following links on primary pages, alternative pages, or both. Before resorting to an alternative page, reconsider the design of the original page; making it accessible is likely to improve it for all users.

top of page

 

Guideline 12. Provide context and orientation information.

Provide context and orientation information to help users understand complex pages or elements.
Grouping elements and providing contextual information about the relationships between elements can be useful for all users. Complex relationships between parts of a page may be difficult for people with cognitive disabilities and people with visual disabilities to interpret.


Checkpoints:
12.1 Title each frame to facilitate frame identification and navigation.
For example, in HTML use the "title" attribute on FRAME elements.

12.2 Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone.
For example, in HTML, use "longdesc," or a description link.

12.3 Divide large blocks of information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate.
For example, in HTML, use OPTGROUP to group OPTION elements inside a SELECT; group form controls with FIELDSET and LEGEND; use nested lists where appropriate; use headings to structure documents, etc. Refer also to guideline 3.

12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.
For example, in HTML use LABEL and its "for" attribute.

top of page

 

Guideline 13. Provide clear navigation mechanisms.


Provide clear and consistent navigation mechanisms -- orientation information, navigation bars, a site map, etc. -- to increase the likelihood that a person will find what they are looking for at a site.
Clear and consistent navigation mechanisms are important to people with cognitive disabilities or blindness, and benefit all users.

Checkpoints:
13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link.
Link text should be meaningful enough to make sense when read out of context -- either on its own or as part of a sequence of links. Link text should also be terse.
For example, in HTML, write "Information about version 4.3" instead of "click here". In addition to clear link text, content developers may further clarify the target of a link with an informative link title (e.g., in HTML, the "title" attribute).

13.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites.
For example, use RDF ([RDF]) to indicate the document's author, the type of content, etc.
Note: Some HTML user agents can build navigation tools from document relations described by the HTML LINK element and "rel" or "rev" attributes (e.g., rel="next", rel="previous", rel="index", etc.). Refer also to checkpoint 13.5.

13.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents).
In describing site layout, highlight and explain available accessibility features.

13.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner.

13.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism.

13.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group.

13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences.

13.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc.
Note: This is commonly referred to as "front-loading" and is especially helpful for people accessing information with serial devices such as speech synthesizers.

13.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.).
For example, in HTML specify document collections with the LINK element and the "rel" and "rev" attributes. Another way to create a collection is by building an archive (e.g., with zip, tar and gzip, stuffit, etc.) of the multiple pages.
Note: The performance improvement gained by offline processing can make browsing much less expensive for people with disabilities who may be browsing slowly.

13.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art.
Refer to checkpoint 1.1 and the example of ascii art in the glossary.


Guideline 14. Ensure that documents are clear and simple.

Ensure that documents are clear and simple so they may be more easily understood.
Consistent page layout, recognizable graphics, and easy to understand language benefit all users. In particular, they help people with cognitive disabilities or who have difficulty reading. (However, ensure that images have text equivalents for people who are blind, have low vision, or for any user who cannot or has chosen not to view graphics. Refer also to guideline 1.)
Using clear and simple language promotes effective communication. Access to written information can be difficult for people who have cognitive or learning disabilities. Using clear and simple language also benefits people whose first language differs from your own, including those people who communicate primarily in sign language.

Checkpoints:
14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content.

14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page.
Refer also to guideline 1.

14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages.

top of page

 

Appendix A. -- Validation

Validate accessibility with automatic tools and human review. Automated methods are generally rapid and convenient but cannot identify all accessibility issues. Human review can help ensure clarity of language and ease of navigation. Begin using validation methods at the earliest stages of development. Accessibility issues identified early are easier to correct and avoid. The following are some important validation methods:

  1. Use an automated accessibility tool and browser validation tool. Please note that software tools do not address all accessibility issues, such as the meaningfulness of link text, the applicability of a text equivalent, etc. The following are some examples of accessibility evaluation tools.

WAVE: an online accessibility assessment tool that flags any items on a Web page which should be examined for potential accessibility problems, and provides a description of what the problem might be. (http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/)

Bobby: an online or downloadable accessibility checker which provides a semi-automated assessment of accessibility problems on a Web page or group of Web pages; it can identify many problems on sites, and lists problems which it is not able to evaluate automatically and which require manual review. (http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp)

A-Prompt: a tool which identifies potential accessibility problems and provides guided editing to correct the problems. (http://aprompt.snow.utoronto.ca/)

  1. Validate syntax (e.g., HTML, XML, etc.).
  2. Validate style sheets (e.g., CSS).
  3. Use a text-only browser or emulator.
  4. Use multiple graphic browsers, with:
    • sounds and graphics loaded,
    • graphics not loaded,
    • sounds not loaded,
    • no mouse,
    • frames, scripts, style sheets, and applets not loaded
  5. Use several browsers, old and new.
  6. Use a self-voicing browser, a screen reader, magnification software, a small display, etc.
  7. Use spell and grammar checkers. A person reading a page with a speech synthesizer may not be able to decipher the synthesizer's best guess for a word with a spelling error. Eliminating grammar problems increases comprehension.
  8. Review the document for clarity and simplicity. Readability statistics, such as those generated by some word processors may be useful indicators of clarity and simplicity. Better still, ask an experienced (human) editor to review written content for clarity. Editors can also improve the usability of documents by identifying potentially sensitive cultural issues that might arise due to language or icon usage.
  9. Invite people with disabilities to review documents. Expert and novice users with disabilities will provide valuable feedback about accessibility or usability problems and their severity.
 
 

top of page

Site Accessibility Information
City of Oakland | ADA Programs Division | City Administrator's Office
One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Third Floor | Oakland, CA 94612
Voice: (510) 238-5219 | TTY: (510) 238-2007
Last modified on August 16, 2007