|
Information about web accessibility guidelines
can be found below. The guidelines are excerpted from the World Wide Web
Consortium (W3C)
Web Accessibility Initiative. Full text of the guidelines, including the
glossary and specific accessibility techniques, can be found at http://www.w3c.org/WAI.
Skip to the text of the guidelines
Guideline # 1: Provide equivalent
alternatives to auditory and visual content.
Guideline # 2: Don't rely on color alone.
Guideline # 3: Use markup and style sheets and do so properly.
Guideline # 4: Clarify natural language usage.
Guideline # 5: Create tables that transform gracefully.
Guideline # 6: Ensure that pages featuring new technologies
transform gracefully.
Guideline # 7: Ensure user control of time-sensitive content
changes.
Guideline # 8: Ensure direct accessibility of embedded
user interfaces.
Guideline # 9: Design for device-independence.
Guideline # 10: Use interim solutions.
Guideline # 11: Use W3C technologies and guidelines.
Guideline # 12: Provide context and orientation information.
Guideline # 13: Provide clear navigation mechanisms.
Guideline # 14: Ensure that documents are clear and simple.
Appendix A. -- Validation
top of page
Guideline 1. Provide equivalent alternatives
to auditory and visual content.
Provide content that, when presented to the user, conveys essentially
the same function or purpose as auditory or visual content.
Although some people cannot use images, movies, sounds, applets,
etc. directly, they may still use pages that include equivalent
information to the visual or auditory content. The equivalent information
must serve the same purpose as the visual or auditory content. Thus,
a text equivalent for an image of an upward arrow that links to
a table of contents could be "Go to table of contents".
In some cases, an equivalent should also describe the appearance
of visual content (e.g., for complex charts, billboards, or diagrams)
or the sound of auditory content (e.g., for audio samples used in
education).
Checkpoints:
1.1 Provide a text equivalent for every non-text element (e.g.,
via "alt", "longdesc", or in element content).
This includes: images, graphical representations of text (including
symbols), image map regions, animations (e.g., animated GIFs), applets
and programmatic objects, ascii art, frames, scripts, images used
as list bullets, spacers, graphical buttons, sounds (played with
or without user interaction), stand-alone audio files, audio tracks
of video, and video.
For example, in HTML:
Use "alt" for the IMG, INPUT, and APPLET elements, or
provide a text equivalent in the content of the OBJECT and APPLET
elements.
For complex content (e.g., a chart) where the "alt" text
does not provide a complete text equivalent, provide an additional
description using, for example, "longdesc" with IMG or
FRAME, a link inside an OBJECT element, or a description link.
For image maps, either use the "alt" attribute with AREA,
or use the MAP element with A elements (and other text) as content.
1.2 Provide redundant text links for each active region of a
server-side image map.
1.3 Until user agents can automatically read aloud the text equivalent
of a visual track, provide an auditory description of the important
information of the visual track of a multimedia presentation.
1.4 For any time-based multimedia presentation (e.g., a movie
or animation), synchronize equivalent alternatives (e.g., captions
or auditory descriptions of the visual track) with the presentation.
1.5 Until user agents render text equivalents for client-side
image map links, provide redundant text links for each active
region of a client-side image map.
top of page
|
Guideline 2. Don't rely on color alone.
Ensure that text and graphics are understandable when viewed without
color.
If color alone is used to convey information, people who cannot
differentiate between certain colors and users with devices that
have non-color or non-visual displays will not receive the information.
When foreground and background colors are too close to the same
hue, they may not provide sufficient contrast when viewed using
monochrome displays or by people with different types of color deficits.
Checkpoints:
2.1 Ensure that all information conveyed with color is also available
without color, for example from context or markup.
2.2 Ensure that foreground and background color combinations
provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color
deficits or when viewed on a black and white screen.
top of page
|
Guideline 3. Use markup and style sheets and
do so properly.
Mark up documents with the proper structural elements. Control
presentation with style sheets rather than with presentation elements
and attributes.
Using markup improperly -- not according to specification -- hinders
accessibility. Misusing markup for a presentation effect (e.g.,
using a table for layout or a header to change the font size)
makes it difficult for users with specialized software to understand
the organization of the page or to navigate through it. Furthermore,
using presentation markup rather than structural markup to convey
structure (e.g., constructing what looks like a table of data
with an HTML PRE element) makes it difficult to render a page
intelligibly to other devices.
Content developers may be tempted to use (or misuse) constructs
that achieve a desired formatting effect on older browsers. They
must be aware that these practices cause accessibility problems
and must consider whether the formatting effect is so critical
as to warrant making the document inaccessible to some users.
At the other extreme, content developers must not sacrifice appropriate
markup because a certain browser or assistive technology does
not process it correctly. For example, it is appropriate to use
the TABLE element in HTML to mark up tabular information even
though some older screen readers may not handle side-by-side text
correctly (refer to checkpoint 10.3). Using TABLE correctly and
creating tables that transform gracefully (refer to guideline
5) makes it possible for software to render tables other than
as two-dimensional grids.
Checkpoints:
3.1 When an appropriate markup language exists, use markup rather
than images to convey information.
For example, use MathML to mark up mathematical equations, and
style sheets to format text and control layout. Also, avoid using
images to represent text -- use text and style sheets instead.
Refer also to guideline 6 and guideline 11.
3.2 Create documents that validate to published formal grammars.
For example, include a document type declaration at the beginning
of a document that refers to a published DTD (e.g., the strict
HTML 4.0 DTD).
3.3 Use style sheets to control layout and presentation.
For example, use the CSS 'font' property instead of the HTML FONT
element to control font styles.
3.4 Use relative rather than absolute units in markup language
attribute values and style sheet property values.
For example, in CSS, use 'em' or percentage lengths rather than
'pt' or 'cm', which are absolute units. If absolute units are
used, validate that the rendered content is usable (refer to the
section on validation).
3.5 Use header elements to convey document structure and use
them according to specification.
For example, in HTML, use H2 to indicate a subsection of H1. Do
not use headers for font effects.
3.6 Mark up lists and list items properly.
For example, in HTML, nest OL, UL, and DL lists properly.
3.7 Mark up quotations. Do not use quotation markup for formatting
effects such as indentation.
For example, in HTML, use the Q and BLOCKQUOTE elements to markup
short and longer quotations, respectively.
top of page
|
Guideline 4. Clarify natural language usage
Use markup that facilitates pronunciation or interpretation of abbreviated
or foreign text.
When content developers mark up natural language changes in a document,
speech synthesizers and braille devices can automatically switch
to the new language, making the document more accessible to multilingual
users. Content developers should identify the predominant natural
language of a document's content (through markup or HTTP headers).
Content developers should also provide expansions of abbreviations
and acronyms.
In addition to helping assistive technologies, natural language
markup allows search engines to find key words and identify documents
in a desired language. Natural language markup also improves readability
of the Web for all people, including those with learning disabilities,
cognitive disabilities, or people who are deaf.
When abbreviations and natural language changes are not identified,
they may be indecipherable when machine-spoken or brailled.
Checkpoints:
4.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of a document's
text and any text equivalents (e.g., captions).
For example, in HTML use the "lang" attribute. In XML,
use "xml:lang".
4.2 Specify the expansion of each abbreviation or acronym in
a document where it first occurs.
For example, in HTML, use the "title" attribute of the
ABBR and ACRONYM elements. Providing the expansion in the main
body of the document also helps document usability.
4.3 Identify the primary natural language of a document.
For example, in HTML set the "lang" attribute on the
HTML element. In XML, use "xml:lang". Server operators
should configure servers to take advantage of HTTP content negotiation
mechanisms so that clients can automatically retrieve documents
of the preferred language.
top of page
|
Guideline 5. Create tables that transform gracefully.
Ensure that tables have necessary markup to be transformed by accessible
browsers and other user agents.
Tables should be used to mark up truly tabular information ("data
tables"). Content developers should avoid using them to lay
out pages ("layout tables"). Tables for any use also present
special problems to users of screen readers (refer to checkpoint
10.3).
Some user agents allow users to navigate among table cells and access
header and other table cell information. Unless marked-up properly,
these tables will not provide user agents with the appropriate information.
(Refer also to guideline 3.)
The following checkpoints will directly benefit people who access
a table through auditory means (e.g., a screen reader or an automobile-based
personal computer) or who view only a portion of the page at a time
(e.g., users with blindness or low vision using speech output or
a braille display, or other users of devices with small displays,
etc.).
Checkpoints:
5.1 For data tables, identify row and column headers.
For example, in HTML, use TD to identify data cells and TH to
identify headers.
5.2 For data tables that have two or more logical levels of row
or column headers, use markup to associate data cells and header
cells.
For example, in HTML, use THEAD, TFOOT, and TBODY to group rows,
COL and COLGROUP to group columns, and the "axis", "scope",
and "headers" attributes, to describe more complex relationships
among data.
5.3 Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense
when linearized. Otherwise, if the table does not make sense,
provide an alternative equivalent (which may be a linearized version).
Note: Once user agents support style sheet positioning, tables
should not be used for layout. Refer also to checkpoint 3.3.
5.4 If a table is used for layout, do not use any structural
markup for the purpose of visual formatting.
For example, in HTML do not use the TH element to cause the content
of a (non-table header) cell to be displayed centered and in bold.
5.5 Provide summaries for tables.
For example, in HTML, use the "summary" attribute of
the TABLE element.
5.6 Provide abbreviations for header labels.
For example, in HTML, use the "abbr" attribute on the
TH element.
Refer also to checkpoint 10.3.
|
Guideline 6. Ensure that pages featuring new
technologies transform gracefully.
Ensure that pages are accessible even when newer technologies
are not supported or are turned off.
Although content developers are encouraged to use new technologies
that solve problems raised by existing technologies, they should
know how to make their pages still work with older browsers and
people who choose to turn off features.
Checkpoints:
6.1 Organize documents so they may be read without style sheets.
For example, when an HTML document is rendered without associated
style sheets, it must still be possible to read the document.
When content is organized logically, it will be rendered in
a meaningful order when style sheets are turned off or not supported.
6.2 Ensure that equivalents for dynamic content are updated
when the dynamic content changes.
6.3 Ensure that pages are usable when scripts, applets, or
other programmatic objects are turned off or not supported.
If this is not possible, provide equivalent information on an
alternative accessible page.
For example, ensure that links that trigger scripts work when
scripts are turned off or not supported (e.g., do not use "javascript:"
as the link target). If it is not possible to make the page
usable without scripts, provide a text equivalent with the NOSCRIPT
element, or use a server-side script instead of a client-side
script, or provide an alternative accessible page as per checkpoint
11.4.
6.4 For scripts and applets, ensure that event handlers are
input device-independent.
6.5 Ensure that dynamic content is accessible or provide an
alternative presentation or page.
For example, in HTML, use NOFRAMES at the end of each frameset.
For some applications, server-side scripts may be more accessible
than client-side scripts.
Refer also to checkpoint 11.4.
Guideline 7. Ensure user control of time-sensitive
content changes.
Ensure that moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating objects
or pages may be paused or stopped.
Some people with cognitive or visual disabilities are unable to
read moving text quickly enough or at all. Movement can also cause
such a distraction that the rest of the page becomes unreadable
for people with cognitive disabilities. Screen readers are unable
to read moving text. People with physical disabilities might not
be able to move quickly or accurately enough to interact with moving
objects.
Note: All of the following checkpoints involve some content developer
responsibility until user agents provide adequate feature control
mechanisms.
Checkpoints:
7.1 Until user agents allow users to control flickering, avoid
causing the screen to flicker.
Note: People with photosensitive epilepsy can have seizures triggered
by flickering or flashing in the 4 to 59 flashes per second (Hertz)
range with a peak sensitivity at 20 flashes per second as well
as quick changes from dark to light (like strobe lights).
7.2 Until user agents allow users to control blinking, avoid
causing content to blink (i.e., change presentation at a regular
rate, such as turning on and off).
7.3 Until user agents allow users to freeze moving content, avoid
movement in pages.
When a page includes moving content, provide a mechanism within
a script or applet to allow users to freeze motion or updates.
Using style sheets with scripting to create movement allows users
to turn off or override the effect more easily. Refer also to
guideline 8.
7.4 Until user agents provide the ability to stop the refresh,
do not create periodically auto-refreshing pages.
For example, in HTML, don't cause pages to auto-refresh with "HTTP-EQUIV=refresh"
until user agents allow users to turn off the feature.
7.5 Until user agents provide the ability to stop auto-redirect,
do not use markup to redirect pages automatically. Instead, configure
the server to perform redirects.
Note: The BLINK and MARQUEE elements are not defined in any W3C
HTML specification and should not be used. Refer also to guideline
11.
top of page
|
Guideline 8. Ensure direct accessibility of
embedded user interfaces.
Ensure that the user interface follows principles of accessible
design: device-independent access to functionality, keyboard operability,
self-voicing, etc.
When an embedded object has its "own interface", the interface
-- like the interface to the browser itself -- must be accessible.
If the interface of the embedded object cannot be made accessible,
an alternative accessible solution must be provided.
Note: For information about accessible interfaces, please consult
the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-USERAGENT]) and the
Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines ([WAI-AUTOOL]).
Checkpoint:
8.1 Make programmatic elements such as scripts and applets directly
accessible or compatible with assistive technologies
Refer also to guideline 6.
top of page
|
Guideline 9. Design for device-independence.
Use features that enable activation of page elements via a variety
of input devices.
Device-independent access means that the user may interact with
the user agent or document with a preferred input (or output) device
-- mouse, keyboard, voice, head wand, or other. If, for example,
a form control can only be activated with a mouse or other pointing
device, someone who is using the page without sight, with voice
input, or with a keyboard or who is using some other non-pointing
input device will not be able to use the form.
Note: Providing text equivalents for image maps or images used as
links makes it possible for users to interact with them without
a pointing device. Refer also to guideline 1.
Generally, pages that allow keyboard interaction are also accessible
through speech input or a command line interface.
Checkpoints:
9.1 Provide client-side image maps instead of server-side image
maps except where the regions cannot be defined with an available
geometric shape.
Refer also to checkpoint 1.1, checkpoint 1.2, and checkpoint 1.5.
9.2 Ensure that any element that has its own interface can be
operated in a device-independent manner.
Refer to the definition of device independence.
Refer also to guideline 8.
9.3 For scripts, specify logical event handlers rather than device-dependent
event handlers.
9.4 Create a logical tab order through links, form controls,
and objects.
For example, in HTML, specify tab order via the "tabindex"
attribute or ensure a logical page design.
9.5 Provide keyboard shortcuts to important links (including
those in client-side image maps), form controls, and groups of
form controls.
For example, in HTML, specify shortcuts via the "accesskey"
attribute.
top of page
|
Guideline 10. Use interim solutions.
Use interim accessibility solutions so that assistive technologies
and older browsers will operate correctly.
For example, older browsers do not allow users to navigate to empty
edit boxes. Older screen readers read lists of consecutive links
as one link. These active elements are therefore difficult or impossible
to access. Also, changing the current window or popping up new windows
can be very disorienting to users who cannot see that this has happened.
Note: The following checkpoints apply until user agents (including
assistive technologies) address these issues. These checkpoints
are classified as "interim", meaning that the Web Content
Guidelines Working Group considers them to be valid and necessary
to Web accessibility as of the publication of this document. However,
the Working Group does not expect these checkpoints to be necessary
in the future, once Web technologies have incorporated anticipated
features or capabilities.
Checkpoints:
10.1 Until user agents allow users to turn off spawned windows,
do not cause pop-ups or other windows to appear and do not change
the current window without informing the user.
For example, in HTML, avoid using a frame whose target is a new
window.
10.2 Until user agents support explicit associations between
labels and form controls, for all form controls with implicitly
associated labels, ensure that the label is properly positioned.
The label must immediately precede its control on the same line
(allowing more than one control/label per line) or be in the line
preceding the control (with only one label and one control per
line). Refer also to checkpoint 12.4.
10.3 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render
side-by-side text correctly, provide a linear text alternative
(on the current page or some other) for all tables that lay out
text in parallel, word-wrapped columns.
Note: Please consult the definition of linearized table. This
checkpoint benefits people with user agents (such as some screen
readers) that are unable to handle blocks of text presented side-by-side;
the checkpoint should not discourage content developers from using
tables to represent tabular information.
10.4 Until user agents handle empty controls correctly, include
default, place-holding characters in edit boxes and text areas.
For example, in HTML, do this for TEXTAREA and INPUT.
10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render
adjacent links distinctly, include non-link, printable characters
(surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links.
top of page
|
Guideline 11. Use W3C technologies and guidelines.
Use W3C technologies (according to specification) and follow accessibility
guidelines. Where it is not possible to use a W3C technology, or
doing so results in material that does not transform gracefully,
provide an alternative version of the content that is accessible.
The current guidelines recommend W3C technologies (e.g., HTML, CSS,
etc.) for several reasons:
- W3C technologies include "built-in" accessibility
features.
- W3C specifications undergo early review to ensure that accessibility
issues are considered during the design phase.
- W3C specifications are developed in an open, industry consensus
process.
Many non-W3C formats (e.g., PDF, Shockwave, etc.) require viewing
with either plug-ins or stand-alone applications. Often, these formats
cannot be viewed or navigated with standard user agents (including
assistive technologies). Avoiding non-W3C and non-standard features
(proprietary elements, attributes, properties, and extensions) will
tend to make pages more accessible to more people using a wider
variety of hardware and software. When inaccessible technologies
(proprietary or not) must be used, equivalent accessible pages must
be provided.
Even when W3C technologies are used, they must be used in accordance
with accessibility guidelines. When using new technologies, ensure
that they transform gracefully (Refer also to guideline 6.).
Note: Converting documents (from PDF, PostScript, RTF, etc.) to
W3C markup languages (HTML, XML) does not always create an accessible
document. Therefore, validate each page for accessibility and usability
after the conversion process (refer to the section on validation).
If a page does not readily convert, either revise the page until
its original representation converts appropriately or provide an
HTML or plain text version.
Checkpoints:
11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate
for a task and use the latest versions when supported. (Consult
http://www.w3c.org/).
Refer to the list of references for information about where to
find the latest W3C specifications and [WAI-UA-SUPPORT] for information
about user agent support for W3C technologies.
11.2 Avoid deprecated features of W3C technologies.
For example, in HTML, don't use the deprecated FONT element; use
style sheets instead (e.g., the 'font' property in CSS).
11.3 Provide information so that users may receive documents
according to their preferences (e.g., language, content type,
etc.)
Note: Use content negotiation where possible.
11.4 If, after best efforts, you cannot create an accessible
page, provide a link to an alternative page that uses W3C technologies,
is accessible, has equivalent information (or functionality),
and is updated as often as the inaccessible (original) page.
Note: Content developers should only resort to alternative pages
when other solutions fail because alternative pages are generally
updated less often than "primary" pages. An out-of-date
page may be as frustrating as one that is inaccessible since,
in both cases, the information presented on the original page
is unavailable. Automatically generating alternative pages may
lead to more frequent updates, but content developers must still
be careful to ensure that generated pages always make sense, and
that users are able to navigate a site by following links on primary
pages, alternative pages, or both. Before resorting to an alternative
page, reconsider the design of the original page; making it accessible
is likely to improve it for all users.
top of page
|
Guideline 12. Provide context and orientation
information.
Provide context and orientation information to help users understand
complex pages or elements.
Grouping elements and providing contextual information about the
relationships between elements can be useful for all users. Complex
relationships between parts of a page may be difficult for people
with cognitive disabilities and people with visual disabilities
to interpret.
Checkpoints:
12.1 Title each frame to facilitate frame identification and navigation.
For example, in HTML use the "title" attribute on FRAME
elements.
12.2 Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to
each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone.
For example, in HTML, use "longdesc," or a description
link.
12.3 Divide large blocks of information into more manageable
groups where natural and appropriate.
For example, in HTML, use OPTGROUP to group OPTION elements inside
a SELECT; group form controls with FIELDSET and LEGEND; use nested
lists where appropriate; use headings to structure documents,
etc. Refer also to guideline 3.
12.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls.
For example, in HTML use LABEL and its "for" attribute.
top of page
|
Guideline 13. Provide clear navigation mechanisms.
Provide clear and consistent navigation mechanisms -- orientation
information, navigation bars, a site map, etc. -- to increase the
likelihood that a person will find what they are looking for at
a site.
Clear and consistent navigation mechanisms are important to people
with cognitive disabilities or blindness, and benefit all users.
Checkpoints:
13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link.
Link text should be meaningful enough to make sense when read
out of context -- either on its own or as part of a sequence of
links. Link text should also be terse.
For example, in HTML, write "Information about version 4.3"
instead of "click here". In addition to clear link text,
content developers may further clarify the target of a link with
an informative link title (e.g., in HTML, the "title"
attribute).
13.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages
and sites.
For example, use RDF ([RDF]) to indicate the document's author,
the type of content, etc.
Note: Some HTML user agents can build navigation tools from
document relations described by the HTML LINK element and "rel"
or "rev" attributes (e.g., rel="next", rel="previous",
rel="index", etc.). Refer also to checkpoint 13.5.
13.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site
(e.g., a site map or table of contents).
In describing site layout, highlight and explain available accessibility
features.
13.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner.
13.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to
the navigation mechanism.
13.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents),
and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group.
13.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types
of searches for different skill levels and preferences.
13.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings,
paragraphs, lists, etc.
Note: This is commonly referred to as "front-loading"
and is especially helpful for people accessing information with
serial devices such as speech synthesizers.
13.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e.,
documents comprising multiple pages.).
For example, in HTML specify document collections with the LINK
element and the "rel" and "rev" attributes.
Another way to create a collection is by building an archive
(e.g., with zip, tar and gzip, stuffit, etc.) of the multiple
pages.
Note: The performance improvement gained by offline processing
can make browsing much less expensive for people with disabilities
who may be browsing slowly.
13.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art.
Refer to checkpoint 1.1 and the example of ascii art in the
glossary.
|
Guideline 14. Ensure that documents are clear
and simple.
Ensure that documents are clear and simple so they may be more
easily understood.
Consistent page layout, recognizable graphics, and easy to understand
language benefit all users. In particular, they help people with
cognitive disabilities or who have difficulty reading. (However,
ensure that images have text equivalents for people who are blind,
have low vision, or for any user who cannot or has chosen not to
view graphics. Refer also to guideline 1.)
Using clear and simple language promotes effective communication.
Access to written information can be difficult for people who have
cognitive or learning disabilities. Using clear and simple language
also benefits people whose first language differs from your own,
including those people who communicate primarily in sign language.
Checkpoints:
14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a
site's content.
14.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where
they will facilitate comprehension of the page.
Refer also to guideline 1.
14.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across
pages.
top of page
|
Appendix A. -- Validation
Validate accessibility with automatic tools and human review.
Automated methods are generally rapid and convenient but cannot
identify all accessibility issues. Human review can help ensure
clarity of language and ease of navigation. Begin using validation
methods at the earliest stages of development. Accessibility issues
identified early are easier to correct and avoid. The following
are some important validation methods:
- Use an automated accessibility tool and browser validation tool.
Please note that software tools do not address all accessibility
issues, such as the meaningfulness of link text, the applicability
of a text equivalent, etc. The following are some examples of
accessibility evaluation tools.
WAVE: an online accessibility assessment tool that flags any
items on a Web page which should be examined for potential accessibility
problems, and provides a description of what the problem might
be. (http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/)
Bobby: an online or downloadable accessibility checker which
provides a semi-automated assessment of accessibility problems
on a Web page or group of Web pages; it can identify many problems
on sites, and lists problems which it is not able to evaluate
automatically and which require manual review. (http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp)
A-Prompt: a tool which identifies potential accessibility problems
and provides guided editing to correct the problems. (http://aprompt.snow.utoronto.ca/)
- Validate syntax (e.g., HTML, XML, etc.).
- Validate style sheets (e.g., CSS).
- Use a text-only browser or emulator.
- Use multiple graphic browsers, with:
- sounds and graphics loaded,
- graphics not loaded,
- sounds not loaded,
- no mouse,
- frames, scripts, style sheets, and applets not loaded
- Use several browsers, old and new.
- Use a self-voicing browser, a screen reader, magnification software,
a small display, etc.
- Use spell and grammar checkers. A person reading a page with
a speech synthesizer may not be able to decipher the synthesizer's
best guess for a word with a spelling error. Eliminating grammar
problems increases comprehension.
- Review the document for clarity and simplicity. Readability
statistics, such as those generated by some word processors may
be useful indicators of clarity and simplicity. Better still,
ask an experienced (human) editor to review written content for
clarity. Editors can also improve the usability of documents by
identifying potentially sensitive cultural issues that might arise
due to language or icon usage.
- Invite people with disabilities to review documents. Expert
and novice users with disabilities will provide valuable feedback
about accessibility or usability problems and their severity.
|
top of page |